About Me

Name:Sue
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Two Boys and a Race

January 19, 2007

In Psychology Today, the January/February edition, an article on a "study" of conservatives makes a typical Liberal supposition.

I look back to when I first met my recently deceased spouse of 31 years and in the hours' long talks we had then (and continued to have for 33 total years but not always so long)
he asked me, the raging, bleeding heart, pants only, Liberal feminist that I was then,  the following:

There was once a race, which can only  be run once every  generation.  It was a race between two adult males both almost identical in height, weight and strength and ability.

The starting fun went off and the racers took to the course with earnestness, determination and every skill at their command.  For the first half of the race, no one noticed anything amiss.  Then, suddenly,  almost midway through the race, someone noticed that one of the runners, who was running severely behind the front man, had a 50 pound ball chained to his ankle.  Of course all hell broke out.  The race was stopped and everyone including the judges tried, tried and tried to decide how best to finish the race.

One person suggested putting the 50 pound ball on the frontrunner but his stamina was higher at that point and many were afraid that the race would still not be fair.  Others wanted to start the race over again, but that was impossible on that day.  Many argued that the race would have to be run from the beginning on another day when both racers would be rested and the race could be fair to both.  None of these alternatives were realistic.  The race could only be run once in a generation and only at a certain time and place.  What to do?  What to do?

Break the rules, create new ones?  No one could agree.  All of a sudden a person, who had arrived late for the race and so was not aware that a 50 pound ball had been chained to one of the participants suggested calling the race a draw, wait another generation and then rerun the race.  In the meantime,he suggested, the country spend its time discovering how this abominable travesty had come about, publicizing the particulars and making sure that such a thing never, never happened again. 

Instead, everyone could agree on one thing:  put two 50 pound balls on the front runner and let the race finish.  Welcome to affirmative action.  Whites got, at the very least, two 50 pound balls, the race is still not finished and much harm has been done to all participants, but mostly to the runners and the future runners, if any could ever be found that would enter a race like that again.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Am I Going Crazy?

I thought I had lost my mind.  Since the election when the Demo's took "power", it appears to me that every tinfoil hatted loon has come out from under the rocks they were hiding for the past 12 years.  They all seem to me to be using the same string of words in the same string of sentences with the same googly type of faces.  That even includes the politicians.  Nancy Pelosi and her rapid blinking tic, Sharpton's awed look, Barney Frank's pissed off look.  That is bad enough, but it seems to me that the tinfoil hatted loons actually think they have something of importance, nay, intelligence to say.

Am I going crazy? 

Yesterday I listened to some loon who kept talking through, under and over everybody else even when it wasn't her turn.  With that same doopy look they get and that odd twist of the head...always to the right, as if that made what they were repeating endlessly correct.  They can't hear themselves talk, or watch themselves so you are made to wonder if they even know what they actually look like.  You know, like a James Carville. Sidney Blumenthal or Begala!  At least, I am pretty sure they knew how they sounded and looked like.  They just didn't care that they were lying and knew that we knew they were lying but if they lied often enough, we the dupes, would believe them. And, guess what?  Almost 50% of the American public did!  Wow!  How's that for a lack of gray matter!!  Remember "if the glove fits you must acquit?" from Johnny?  Ten years down the road almost nobody believes O.J.  We know he almost beheaded Nicole and killed Ron.  Maybe the almost 50% will get around to knowing the truth in a few years...but I seriously doubt it, stupid is as stupid does.  Yeah, yeah I know I shouldn't call names, but isn't that exactly what is wrong with the Right?  We don't call it what it is and look at the mess we're in.

And, to make matters really worse, there is not one single bad thing these loons can say or do that they'll get in trouble for.  Newsom in San Fran having an affair with an aide.  Turner marketing some show/channel...who knows in Boston and freezing the city in its tracks.  Jihadist Jane and too tall Tim with his S.O. at his side along with Sean bleating about the Iraq. 

And, if that doesn't tick you royally off....how about that Arkin fool at the Washington Post/NBC calling our troops "mercenaries" and telling them they're so well off?  Or the weasel Chirac telling the world it is O.K. for Iran to have a couple of nukes?  Too bad they wouldn't be aimed right at the Arc de Triomf so we could get rid of this jerk.

Sorry folks, it's late here on the Ultra Leftist Coast of California and I needed to vent cause I'm not going crazy just horribly frustrated.

P.S. I did so mean "doopy".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAT DO THEY WANT?

January 18, 2007

Just exactly what does the American Left want this country to be?  If I listen to the main street media, they want universal health care, higher minimum wage, higher taxes for anyone who makes over $100,000 per year,
civil liberties (exactly what is that?) for everyone (except conservatives).  In other words, not the very rich, white majority.  They want the homeless to be supported, they want illegal aliens to get more rights than average Americans, they want only minorities admitted to universities (except Asians), they want make sure that any "want" in America is taken care of and paid for by you and me. 

What they don't want is the free speech they constantly rag everybody about...they want to get the Fairness Doctrine back so that their liberal friends like Al Franken can make money at our expense whether we want to listen to them or not.  They want free love in the parks in the middle of the day regardless of who is around... San Francisco passed a law to allow this. . Free drugs for everyone that wants them.  They want our "educational" system to stop being an educational system and instead become a brainwashing tool for their ideology.  They don't want guns in our hands even though the police and the courts can't protect all of us.  And, if a "criminal" is actually caught and confesses, there is always a good "reason" why they did what they did: doesn't have anything to do with the crime;  they're mommy or their aunt or their teacher made them do it.   There are now maladies with discussed in initials like  ADD, ADS, TPM, PMS, PTSD...you name it, there are initial for it.

The American Left wants no rules for you and me.   Except their rules.They will tell us how much money we can make.  That we must continue to work and create wealth for them so they can tax it away from us.  They do not like war, so they'll let despots continue killing millions around the world just like the last century.  They want America on its knees apologizing while doling out billions so that the elite in countries in the world get rich like Idi Amin or Arafat.  They don't want anything to change in South America.  Let the rich folk their keep their massive share of the wealth and make the poor peons walk north and be nannies for the kids, gardeners for our lawns, low wage earners without security so that business owners can enrich them further.  They don't want to prosecute criminals, illegals or otherwise, they want to "treat" them so that they can get better.  They have more symptoms with initials and they want to create more.

In the Left Coast of America, also known as California, they are trying to pass a bill to outlaw spanking children under 3.  That is great.  But what about Jessica's Law to help 14 year-olds and younger from being sexually abused?  Nah, they didn't want to pass anything too strong on that subject.

Oh, well, we can't stop any of this because so many voters didn't think logically, they voted the ideology the Left sold them and because they were convinced by the main street media and leftists politicians that we should not have gone to Iraq.  Of course, they forgot(?) to tell the country that because of Viet Nam and their part in shutting that down, millions lost their lives.  They didn't think about the "Killing Fields" mentality that is harbored by despots of all ilk.  The left doesn't care about people dying unless they die fighting us in a war that, if we lose, will cost them every freedom they imagine they have.  It will cost them their riches and power and remove their ideology from the face of the planet.  They forget that 10% of l.5 billion is a whole hell of alot of terrorists and that they want us to convert, kill us or make us into a dhimmi country. 

So, I ask again, exactly what do the tinfoil hatted Left loons want?  At the rate the are going, they are going to get exactly what they deserve:  extinction or servitude!!  Of course, we'll also get what they deserve. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You and me!

December 27, 2006


When Cro-magnons, modern man, us came over the hill, or crossed the river or came down
the mountain it caused the extinction of all other branches of the hominid line that spawned
them.

Since then, over 50,000 years ago, mankind turned towards two human distinctions:  leader
and the rest.  Through whatever means necessary, religious, fear, idolatry, tribes throughout
the world ended up being "ruled".  The rules and laws were made for submission of the
multitude to the few.  Check it out.

America, after several hundreds of years, tried to bring to fruition the Judeo-Christian philosophy.  America was an experiment meant to change the 50,000 years of modern man's insistence on inequality, unfairness and subjugation of people to an end.  In the context of their time, the Founding Fathers established a document wrested out of competing minds, the Constitution of the United States of America.  It was an experiment that I am very sad to say has failed.  Not because the Founding Fathers were wrong.  But because the obsessive need for power by those long in power and the "newbies" who have gained power through money, influence or connections in the past 60 years do not want to give up the power.  The taste of it, as in Hillary Clinton, Howard Dean, John Conyers, et. al., drives the ambition to keep it, get it and pass it on to theirs only.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Genteel and Civil, NOT!

January 16, 2007....forwarded to me by Anonymous...or as the MSM are fond of saying "from an anonymous source"...heh!

FWD: Memo From a Secret Service Agent

I flew 4 Presidential support missions in the C-141 out of Dover AFB, DE, two for President Johnson and two for President Nixon.

Johnson was a first class jerk and on the two occasions I flew for him, if the Secret Service and their Liaison in the Pentagon hadn't intervened, we would have had to stay on the airplane for hours while he (Johnson) was off somewhere. Nixon never required that, and the four (4) stops we made with him he was cordial to the Secret Service and to my crew and me.

Denny Keast:  We had a neighbor when I lived in DC who was part of the secret service presidential detail for many years. His stories of Kennedy and Johnson were the same as those I heard from the guys who flew the presidents' plane.   Yes, Kennedy did have Marilyn Monroe flown in for secret "dates," and LBJ was a typical Texas "good ole boy" womanizer. Nixon, Bush 41, and Carter never cheated on their wives. Clinton cheated, but couldn't match Kennedy or LBJ in style or variety.

The information below is accurate: The elder Bush and current president Bush make it a point to thank and take care of the air crews who fly them around. When the president flies, there are several planes that also go and carry the armored  limo, another the security detail, plus usually a press aircraft. Both Bush's made it a point to stay home on holidays, so the Air Force and security people could have a day with their families.

Hillary Clinton was arrogant and orally abusive to her security detail. She forbade her daughter, Chelsea, from exchanging pleasantries with them. Sometimes Chelsea, miffed at her mother's obvious conceit and mean spiritedness ignored her demands and exchanged pleasantries regardless, but never in her mother's presence.

Chelsea really was a nice, kindhearted, and lovely young lady.  The consensus opinion was that Chelsea loved her Mom but did not like her. Hillary Clinton was continuously rude and abrasive to those who were charged to protect her life.  Her security detail dutifully did their job, as professionals should, but they all loathed her and wanted to be on a different detail. Hillary Clinton was despised by the Secret Service as a whole.

Former President Bill Clinton was much more amiable than his wife. Often the Secret Service would cringe at the verbal attacks Hillary would use against her husband.  They were embarrassed for his sake by the manner and frequency in which she verbally insulted him, sometimes in the presence of the Secret Service, and sometimes behind closed doors.  Even behind closed doors Hillary Clinton would scream and holler so loudly that everyone could hear what she was saying.

Many felt sorry for President Clinton and most wondered why he tolerated it instead of just divorcing his "attack dog" wife. It was crystal clear that the Clinton's neither liked nor respected each other and this was true long before the Monica Lewinsky scandal.  Theirs was genuinely a "Marriage of convenience."  Chelsea was much closer to her father than her mother, even after the Lewinsky scandal, which hurt her gravely.

Bill Clinton did in fact have charisma, and occasionally would smile at or shake hands with his security detail.  Still, he always displayed an obvious air of superiority towards them.  His security detail uniformly believed him to be disingenuous, false, and that he did nothing without a motive that in some way would enhance his image and political career. He was polite, but not kind.  They did not particularly like him and nobody trusted him.

Al Gore was the male version of Hillary Clinton. They were friendlier toward each other than either of them was towards former President Clinton. They were not intimate, so please don't read that in.  They were very close in a political way.  Tipper Gore was generally nice and pleasant. She initially liked Hillary but soon after the election she had her "pegged" and no longer liked her or associated with her except for events that were politically obligatory.  Al Gore was far more left wing than Bill Clinton.  Al Gore resented Bill Clinton and thought he was too "centrist." He despised all Republicans. His hatred was bitter and this was long before he announced for the Presidency. This hatred was something that he and Hillary had in common. They often said as much, even in the presence of their security detail. Neither of them trusted Bill Clinton and, the Secret Service opined, neither of them even liked Bill Clinton.

Bill Clinton did have some good qualities, whereas Al Gore and Hillary had none, in the view of their security details. Al Gore, like Hillary, was very rude and arrogant toward his security detail.  He was extremely unappreciative and would not hesitate to scold them in the presence of their peers for minor details over which they had no control.

Al Gore also looked down on them, as they finally observed and learned with certainty on one occasion.  Al got angry at his offspring and pointed at his security detail and said, "Do you want to grow up and be like them?"  Word of this insult by the former Vice-President quickly spread and he became as disliked by the Secret Service as Hillary. Most of them prayed that Al Gore would not be elected President, and they really did have private celebrations in a few of their homes after President Bush won.  This was not necessarily to celebrate President Bush's election, but to celebrate Al Gore's defeat.

Everyone in the Secret Service wants to be on First Lady Laura Bush's detail.  Without exception, they concede that she is perhaps the nicest and most kind person they have ever had the privilege of serving.  Where Hillary patently refused to allow her picture to be taken with her security detail, Laura Bush doesn't even have to be asked, she offers. She doesn't just shake their hand and say, "Thank you."  Very often, she will give members of her detail a kindhearted hug to express her appreciation. There is nothing false about her.  This is her genuine nature.  Her security detail considers her to be a "breath of fresh air."

They joke that comparing Laura Bush with Hillary Clinton is like comparing "Mother Teresa" with the "Wicked Witch of the North." Likewise, the Secret Service considers President Bush to be a gem of a man to work for.  He always treats them with genuine respect and he always trusts and listens to their expert advice.  They really like the Crawford, Texas detail.  Every time the president goes to Crawford he has a Bar-B-Q for his security detail and he helps serve their meals. He sits with them, eats with them, and talks with them.  He knows each of them by their first name, and calls them by their first name as a show of affection. He always asks about their family, the names of which he always remembers. They believe that he is deeply and genuinely appreciative of their service. They could not like, love, or respect anyone more than President Bush.  Most of them did not know they would feel this way, until they had an opportunity to work for him and learn that his manner was genuine and consistent.  It has never changed since he began his Presidency. He always treats them with the utmost respect, kindness, and compassion.

Please pass this on.  It is important for Americans to have a true inside understanding of their President.

        *     *     *     *                                      *     *     *     *                                 *     *     *     *

I cannot offer any attribution, first because those who forwarded don't wish me to and second because it may
prove harmful to the writer of the letter.  But, it's a good read anyway and sure fits what I have felt all along about the politicians on both sides of the aisle.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TRIBILISM?

01/15/2007

Homo sapiens, us, are descended from hundreds of thousands of "tribes".  In the beginning, and until about two hundred and fifty years ago, we were still part of tribes called English, French, Chinese, Japanese, African, American Indian and so on, and so on, and so on.

Then an unexpected:  people chose to leave these "tribal" areas in the hopes of living lives without the unconscionable government cruelty that had existed for thousands of years (and still does in almost every country in the world).  People were not people to the rulers of these countries.  They had, over millennia, become slaves to be used, abused and killed at leisure.  They had no rights.  Were allowed no thought.  Theirs was to slave daily for their masters and hope for a small crumb at the end of each day with which to feed their families.  But the choice of embarking on what must, then, have been an almost impossible journey, was taken and on the East Coast of a country recently discovered, humans looking for freedom of sorts found their way here.  On the West Coast, another group of humans, more looking for choices in lifestyle and enrichment, traveled from South America. 

A new "concept" had been born, even though no one thought of it that way.  For, in America, a new "tribe" was to rise up and create an awesome powerhouse in just two hundred years.  America also became a tribal country, but, this tribe was made up of the members of many tribes from around the world.  Sure, there were problems.  Still are if you just care to look around America the world today.  But, in less than 250 years, this country continued the experiment created by America's Founding Fathers. 

Our tribe, Americans, are unique in the world.  We each have our own "old" culture to look back on, but we have a more important current culture to care for.  At least 49% of us aren't doing a good job of it.  Why?  Because about 75+/- years ago, a small percentage of people who had emigrated or were arriving to get away from their own hell didn't come for any freedoms, they came with a conception of power that has given rise to socialist/communist sympathizers who wish to change what made America great and turn it into another third world country populating the planet.  It is an old canard to say "equality" for all, when in reality what you are really saying is:

          I know what is best.  Let me do it my way.  You have no choices.  I will decide how you
         should live.

Sound familiar?  Kings used it.  Popes used it.  Emperors used it.  Presidents use it.  Senators and congressmen use it.  Governors, mayors and police captains use it.   We use it when we try to teach our children how to be.  Teachers use it to make children try to behave.

Every law and rule we have is someone's attempt to control someone else.  It is too sad that today, the laws and rules have become ridiculous.  No transfat.  No foie gras.  No free speech.  No...no...no...no.  Perhaps we, as a group really need minuscule meddling to keep us straight.  Hmmmmmmm.

    


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hypocricy

January 13, 2007

Hypocrisy, thy name is Barbara Boxer


There many other names that would apply equally to Ms. Boxer.  After all she is one of the two Senators from the Left Coast State of California.  She has spoken uncivilly for many years to anyone who holds any view different from hers.  She is what I call a "queen bee" female.  A subject I have written about in this blog.  She is the opposite of what an "alpha male" is.  Notice, however, that nowhere does the description use the words woman and man.  Male and female is exactly what these people are.  They are very much like spoiled, strong willing children that will, in fact, hold their breath until they turn blue unless they get their way.  I call her behavior shameful.  It is certainly not a "human" trait, it is a trait of the very conceited to "speak truth to power", indeed.  She should have said "speak with power against the truth"!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TAXES??? What Taxes??

Is this the Dems agenda???

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries, then
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his a...

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers,
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid.

Put these words
upon his tomb,
"Taxes drove me
to my doom..."

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax,
Fuel permit tax
Gasoline Tax (42 cents per gallon)
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Interest expense
Inventory tax
IRS Interest Charges, IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax),
Liquor Tax,
Luxury Taxes,
Marriage License Tax,
Medicare Tax,
Property Tax,
Real Estate Tax Service charge taxes,
Social Security Tax, Road usage taxes,
Sales Tax, Recreational Vehicle Tax,
School Tax,
State Income Tax,
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA),
Telephone federal excise tax,
Telephone federal universal service fee tax,
Telephone federal,
State and local surcharge taxes,
Telephone minimum usage surcharge tax,
Telephone recurring and non-recurring charges tax,
Telephone state and local tax,
Telephone usage charge tax,
Utility Taxes,
Vehicle License Registration Tax,
Vehicle Sales Tax,
Watercraft registration Tax,
Well Permit Tax,
Workers Compensation Tax

COMMENTS: Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation
was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national

debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to
raise the kids. What happened?
And I still have to "press 1" for English cuz No Hablo Espanol.

Courtesy of "no names wanted" public.  So.  Thanks to them!  They'll know who they are.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gee, Ya Think???

Great post from American Thinker.com...a daily must read of mine.  I would only add that our societal characteristics are very ancient...possibly began with the ascent of Cro-Magnon, us.


January 06, 2007

Ideas have consequences

Thomas Lifson
From an Australian blog, The Mind of Flapjack, comes a reminder that some of our most troubling societal characteristics are not that recent in origin.
I've almost finished reading Ideas Have Consequences, and although it was written in 1948, it is quite applicable to our society today. Some things have to be forgiven simply due to the time that has passed since its publication and now, but the overall tone of the book is spot-on. This paragraph in particular is relevant when considering what is wrong in American society today:
In the final analysis this society is like the spoiled child in its incapacity to think. Anyone can observe in the pampered children of the rich a kind of irresponsibility of the mental process. It occurs simply because they do not have to think to survive. They never have to feel that definition must be clear and deduction correct if they are to escape the sharp penalties of deprivation. Therefore the typical thinking of such people is fragmentary, discursive, and expressive of a sort of contempt for realities. Their conclusions are not "earned" in the sense of being logically valid but are seized in the face of facts. The young scion knows that, if he falls, there is a net below to catch him. Hardness of condition is wanting. Without work to do, especially without work that is related to our dearest aims, the mental sinews atrophy, as do the physical. There is evidence that the masses, spoiled by like conditions, incur a similar flabbiness and in crises will prove unable to think straight enough to save themselves.

- Richard M. Weaver, Ideas Have Consequences
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ford's Funeral

I watched our 38th President's Funeral.  I did not plan it.  It was pretty much all there was on the cable channels I watch.  Once started, however, I watched until the Air Force jet took off the runway and headed West. 

Everyone, all day, talked about the simplicity and dignity of the funeral.  I loved the church services and the church in particular.  Churches hold a special fascination for me as an old Catholic girl.  The grandeur and the majesty has been lost in the past few decades as the new churches of all religions are built "simplistically".  There are none, in these new churches, of the ancient mystery that surrounds the old churches.  There was a reason the churches were built the way they were by the powers of the religion. 

Simplicity should not be part of a church structure.  At least not, in my opinion.  Going to church is much more than simply sitting, standing, kneeling and following the usual service.  There should be an air of the ancient.  A symbolism that should touch that archaic part of each and everyone of us regardless of whether we believe in deities or not. 

Carl Jung, a contemporary of Freud, based his psychological thesis on his belief that we humans have, deep within our DNA, ancient archetypes that trigger emotional responses in our lives.  Jung separated himself from Freud because Freud believed so much of our "problems" were based on some sort of sexual repression, particularly women.  

Today, we say "marketing" to denote the tickling of our ancient archetypes to promote a response or "politics" to tickle the response that "marketing" has been conditioning us to respond to.   Whether you buy a certain brand of anything, you have been the subject of a form of "marketing".  Some  Wall Street type  on the East or West coast has been making a load of money by getting you and I to believe whatever he sells.  Most of us tend to not only buy into their philosophy, but we end up buying the product!

So, the funeral service was a real treat for me. Simple, but majestic in its aura of ancient archetypes.  May he rest in peace!
01/05/07



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Queen Bee Pelosi?

Forty years ago I worked in a corporation that ultimately was forced into extinction:  a savings and loan.  It was a great concept but because of its stringent lending rules, there was very little fraud possible and only those who could actually document affordability would be approved for a loan.  There were many and varied "freedoms" for homeowners in those years.  All that has changed completely and it is doubtful anyone even remembers that era.  However, one thing that has never changed was the concept of the "queen bee" in the business world, we thought.  Today, of course, I know we were uninformed and naive.

In the large, statewide, corporation that I worked there were many inequities.  The one that could and did cause the most harm was the "queen bee" syndrome.  The hierarchy throughout the company and its branches were fairly simple:  the top boss, his secondary string and then the workers.  I was one of the workers for nearly 10 years, before I moved up the rung that had begun to extend to women.  But I never forgot the "queen bee" of each office, including the various large departments within the headquarters of the company.  They were the gals that took  for themselves the power to make the rest of our lives difficult. The powers that our bosses, men, never noticed.  The "queen" made absolutely sure they didn't.  Any job she didn't want to handle she passed on to us.  The more ugly the job the more a lowly paid gal got it to do, and, to the "queen's" satisfaction. 

Those were the days before "correction" tape or white out.  Carbon paper ruled the day.  You needed 10 copies of something?  You typed an original with 10 papers intermixed with carbon paper.  In my department, The Executive, you were never allowed to erase.  You typed perfectly and if you made a mistake, you started over.  We learned never to make a typo.  And, because we used the old typewriters speed was something you strived for, but never truly achieved.
Too big a chance of making a mistake.  When the new Selectrics came on board, you could sing!!  And boy, did I...over 100 words per minute.  Ah, memories.Oh, and by the way, no spell check, no grammar hints.  You typed up exactly what you had taken down in Greg shorthand.  Anyone remember that?  I still, to this day, write in shorthand when I don't want anyone reading what I've written.

But the Queen Bee had hidden powers.  She could come in late, leave early, take long lunches and disappear into a nether world for more hours than she worked.  She dressed to the nines.  Always had her hair dressed. Wore very high heels and generally spent her time trying to look good, apply pressure to get us to do most of her work and coddling up to the bosses.  She even got an expense account and generally got to do whatever she wanted.  She was into power and damn the other girls!  Sound familiar?

Nancy Pelosi is, in my opinion, a dead ringer for an old "Queen Bee" that retired a couple of years before I moved on to other things in my life.  Her display of gushiness and wide mouthed fixed smiles for the cameras is a tickle to my unfond memories of the queen bees I've come across in my lifetime.  They are not real women.  They don't understand women, or men for that matter.  They are into "who" they are and they revel in the power they have achieved by whatever means, period.  But, they are not perfect.  So pay attention.  Her foibles, of which there are already a few, will become many more.  When we believe ourselves to be perfect and right about all, we are just setting ourselves up for a fall...and a very long and hard splat at the end.

Welcome Nancy, to the real world.  A world you helped to create.  May you enjoy your brief moment in the spotlight and please, don't whine. 
01/05/07

 


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barbarity "on Demand"


God! I am a coward! I simply cannot watch the video provided by the murderous cowards of the Muslim Islamofascists!!!

Again and again and again in the course of my life I have asked the "Why?" question. And, over the course of my life I tried to find out the answer to so many of my "whys" and so their number decreased. Decreased until this cancer was brought to the light sufficiently that we had our MSM begin to do some coverage.

Today, however, the MSM is silent on the execution of a Atwar Bahjat? Why? I think because to report it in any way or to show pictures or give out the video would do two things: begin the destruction of the fallacy of the apologists' and the information her execution would demand answers to.  These "people", "animals", "beasts"...what to name them..are capable of the most atrocious type of hate imaginable. They don't just kill, efficiently, quickly. They enjoy the torture and the agonizing screams of their victims. They bathe in the prolongation of the blood sport.

If there is a God, and I don't happen to believe there is, then these Islamofascists need to be done away with. No, no torture, but certainly a quick death. They show their ignorance of humanity for they have not yet joined it. Just like the young Jewish man in Europe, they roll in the brutality, gore and blood of what they do and love it!  Grotesque! Abominable.  There does not seem to be words in the lexicon of any language to describe these people and their actions.  None.

What do I care about Saddam!  He deserved to die a hundred thousand times 5 deaths to compensate for his murderous regime.  One push and he's dead just doesn't seem to be enough.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberals & Politics


The "Why" of an email conversation caused me to do a bit of research on the political parties in America. I generally knew that the Democratic Party had ruled here in this country for about 100 years. With the losses only in l980,l982,1984, 1994, briefly in 2000 and, of course, nothing since.

What I discovered, however, was that the Left or some like type had actually been in power in this country since before 1925! There were the Whigs, Free Soil, Know Nothings and Bull Moose Progressives to name a few. When the Republican and Democratic Parties become more mainstream, these different parties split with half to the Republican and half to the Democrats. What I found instructive was that those in favor of a more agrarian country and pro slavery, generally migrated throughout this period towards the Left side of ideology. This is simplistic, but the post needs to be as concise as possible.

Their true loss of power didn't really get achieved for any long period of time, until the current Bush Administration. Eight years out of power in 30 is difficult to say the least.

My focus, however, was on a group that had operated separately until the early 20th century when they merged with the Democrats. They were called the Douglas Democrats. They were largely responsible for Roosevelt's social programs before and have continued to increase in power gradually until the 1960's when their agenda became part of the anti-war movement. At first opportunity they changed the direction of this country. Their "good intentions" for the rest of us based on their ideology created the road paved with gold that has led America to the Hades we have experienced in every part of our country since the 1970's.

They are not, in my opinion, so much Left as truly anti anything American. They believe that they are the leaders in an ideology that stresses the socialist meme of: we know what is best, we will make sure you follow what we say and you will pay with your taxes to make our wishes possible, and you can't do a thing about it!

That is where the hate and vicious vitriol come from, they have not been able to take the reins of this country and until George W. Bush they were confident that their time had come! Bush halted them. In the past five years, they have gradually been exposed for what they are. They have aligned themselves with the existing Fifth Column, Communists and Anarchists and 'hate' became their operative raison d'etre. The middle of the road, reasonable, moderate side of the Left is almost gone. And, as even Kos has learned, no one can control them now.

This group has been part of the American landscape since before its inception and continues to this day. One question: do the supporters of these people understand what the goals are? Or, is the hatred too much to listen to reason.

So, is it any wonder why "they" hate America so much. Will Americans make the mistake of voting them in for complete control in 2008? The congress and then let Hillary/Kerry/Gore or some other with their goals gain the presidency?

It will be an interesting two years. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Factoid


I wonder what people would answer if I asked: what has killed more Americans, war or the automobile? The answer is truly astonishing and says a great deal about us as Americans: since 1775, about 1 million people have perished from wars; and an astounding 2.5 million in automobile accidents.*

One of the most astounding aspects of this question and answer if that it took wars 210 years and it took the automobile only 92 years!

Now ask yourself how many people have been killed in the previous century because of despots throughout the world and the answer would be close to 200 million people. The aforementioned figure is an approximate one because it is impossible to know exactly how many people were actually done away with just in the Soviet Union under the Bolsheviks and then Stalin; in China under Mao not to mention numerous countries all around the world.

So, how many people do you think live in gross conditions all around the world? I would guess close to 5 billion! For these human beings, nothing has changed in hundreds, possibly thousands of years.

Another question: why does the left in the world believe that the only way to help is to allow a totalitarian government to rule? Why does the left ignore the plight of people in the rest of the world when despots rule?

There has not been peace in at least the last five thousand years of history as we know it.  So, how does asking for peace when billions are suffering make any sense.  Why do we give billions to despots around the world when we know most of the money we give ends up in their pockets!  Arafat was a billionaire at his death.  Where did the money come from?

Factoids are curious things...they engender questions that we must think about and find solutions for. 




*Initial question attributed to Marilyn Vos Savant in Parade Magazine.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Esmay vs. Spencer


I put myself through a reading of Esmay and Spencer some time back. I learned more about Islam from Spencer. But, I then read both of their biographies as they themselves posted on their respective blogs: Esmay has Muslim friends; Spencer has studied Islam directly from the Koran and its various Laws from the beginning to the present.

I find the religion of Islam to be, at present, set in stone. The word of Allah as handed down by Muhammad cannot be changed. In order for us to live in peace with Muslims around the world, their religion must make fundamental changes in its original script. Is that possible? I, personally, don't think so because Islam, as it is currently preached by the Imams, has been commanding only three alternatives for infidels: convert, accept dhimmi status or die.

Jesus did away with the Old Testament when he "died" for man's sins. And, no, I am not Christian, I am an atheist. Christianity through the Catholics became corrupted, but the corruption was for money and power. It also had to change in order to be what Jesus originally "died" for. It did and today, except for the faction of fundamentalists, we live in a better society than ever in the history of this planet. Even the other religion's fundamentalists don't cry for death, only the threat of Hades.

Can Islam change? Not for the foreseeable future. So long as death is the result of standing up and speaking, publishing cartoons, writing books, or producing movies, there is no hope that a large enough mass of moderate Muslims will stand up. To be silent is not moderate. Afraid for you and your family, perhaps is what keeps "moderates" at bay.  But I don't believe that is the total answer. To appear to support jihad against anyone who will not support Islam 100% is not moderate but will allow you to live to another day.

My one hope is that America will hold off the hordes long enough to give Islam time to change or at least for there to be enough moderate Muslims standing up. The only alternative I see to outright war with Islam would be for those Muslims who wish to follow exactly the words of their God to go back to countries that follow that philosophy. Posted by: Sue on 09.29.06 at 12:44 PM

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive