About Me

Name:Sue
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Dysfuntion Junction

Posted by Sue on Sunday, September 24, 2006 11:01:35 PM
Bill Clinton in real life!  Can you actually believe that he was caught for being who he truly is?  Slick Willy?  Angry Billy!  Rude.  Crude and dumb.  Dumb to think that he and the Missus can get away with it, one more time.  My first impression was that James Carville was actually wearing a Clinton fake face.  I heard some commentary on that point earlier.  But, remember that all things start at the top.  Bill had then, and has now, the same type of people that he and Hillary had with them for their run for the Presidency and later over the stained Blue dress.  People just like them.  That was the hardest time for me.  I watched as dozens of his "supporters" lied to our faces for weeks, while he did all he could to obstruct justice. 

And, no, don't be dumb too.  He lied under oath!  The President of the United States lied right to our faces while shaking his finger at us as if we were the two year-olds in trouble.  His wife lied to us for him and to herself.   At least, I hope she also lied to herself.  I had a cheating husband at one time, long, long ago.  The first time someone told me that he was cheating, I truly didn't believe it.  By the second and then subsequent times, I knew the truth.   I remember blaming myself for his indiscretions.  I was at fault.  I had a lack.  You name it, I thought it.  The truth was he as not a good man.  If he cheated on me and my children, then what was he really?  Today, decades later, he hasn't changed.  But my hubby today is a true find!  I think that Hillary has chosen political power as her second "hubby".  But no resolution in a life is not good for the peace a human needs to make the kinds of decision a President of America must make.  And, if she if willing to put up with this type of behavior...what other types of things might she be willing to put up with? 

One more thing, he lied.  My Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, l969-71, says:

sexual:  1: of, relating to, or associated with sex or the sexes, 2:  having or involving sex.

sex:  3a. a sexually motivated phenomena  or behavior.

So, had Mr. Clinton said "I did not commit adultery" he wouldn't have lied, and the consequences would not have so very dear.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sorting

Posted by Sue on Sunday, September 24, 2006 12:58:36 PM
   In a July 21, 2006 post, (kmaru@blogspot.com) whose blog is very good , made the point that there has been a "gradually sorting going in the world" since the 1979, when America's Iranian Embassy was invaded.  Read the entire post.  I don't want to take things too much out of context. Although the "world" had been sorting itself out since 1979, our politicians and all the media in this country did nothing to either know it, understand it or acknowledge it, in my opinion. They failed the American populace by continuing on their socialist message and turning a blind eye.

The Middle Eastern countries, on the other hand,  have never educated their masses in anything but the Koran and some only in their inhumane Wahabisims.   The propaganda machines in the Muslim countries have been awesome, from pulpits and on the street,you see hundreds of thousands in many countries "protest" with readily available, preprinted banners, placards, flags all on a moment's notice and on demand.  Much better than the coordination in America and certainly as good as the ultraLeft in this country.

I have watched as the EU has been used to further the aims of the fanatics in the Middle East by the streams of immigrants allowed in these countries and saw the pillaging and burning just a few months ago.   The European attitude of "appeasement" worked only to create a underclass of Muslims, many supported by these socialist countries through their welfare system.  They did nothing to encourage assimilation even though I don't think assimilation would have been possible because of the agenda brought to Europe by the Imams that are the main contributors, as they have always been, towards the overtaking by legal or illegal means the countries that offered by a home as stingy as it was.

America, also allowed the Muslims to emigrate to this country, but unlilke the Socialist EU, this is still a country of entrepreneurship and, generally, in the end money is the most important thing.  However, the Left in this country had not been able to put its agenda into place 100%.   The leaders of the Muslim population in this country, Imams and other seeking to wield power, began to do what the ACLU has been doing, going to the courts and seeking legal means to change laws so that they can move towards their goal of converting this country.  CAIR has been very instrumental in this and uses academics and Muslim students and their sympathizers to good effect.  There is good reason why CAIR uses the legal system, the abuses that have occurred in the world because of their religion's profession of world insensitivity to their God, would not be tolerated here.

I, am personally tired of this religion of Peace.  Those who believe it is possible to dialogue or find consensus for anything with Islam are dead wrong!  I seriously wonder how in the world you negotiate, talk or try to find common ground with people whose belief system is based on the total annihilation of everyone who will not convert or enslavement for those who may be necessary for the running or obtaining the wealth of the countries brought under dhimmi?

It is very clear that the terrorists are committed to their "cause" in a way that you will not find Westerners committed. Westerners have become wussies without a backbone willing to be bent over in order to keep whatever type of life is allowed. Even if, we became the socialist/communist or anarchist government the Left has been demanding for the past 100+ years, what difference does anyone suppose it will make to those who follow the teaching of Islam and their leader of today? The closest analogy I can come up with is: have you ever tried to negotiate or appease a cranky, hostile 2-year old?   The hope is that the 2 year old will grow, with parents and society help, into a responsible, mature thinking human being.  Not so with Islam.  Perhaps they need another 1000 years in order to grow enough to be able to live with the rest of us in this imperfect world and its imperfect peoples.

Sigh, we are in for a brutal, long term 'war' and I greatly fear for my great grandchildren for they may not be free, just dead or bowed.
Sue | 09.22.06 - 2:05 pm | #
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Definition of Words

Posted by Sue on Saturday, September 23, 2006 7:32:31 PM
I have been unable to post this because this site does not allow the use of certain words. I can understand that in today's PC world.  However, how are we to ever get to the heart of anything if we are not allowed the freedom to use the words necessary to express out thoughts? 

I need to establish some guidelines: definition of words is very important. What I think a word means may be different from how you define a word. An example: when I started in the loan business, we had Loan Officers...salespeople who sold the products. Today, however, they are called AE's or Account Executives.

See what I mean? Check this out in your own world. If you are young ask your parent's to find examples. Another reason definition is very important between people, is that what is intended may not be what is understood. "Nothing" is a word that means one thing to women and another to men!

When I use the word tribe, I mean a small group of people that are together to simply survive. Simply put, there is safety in numbers. It is easier to find food, find or make shelter and make sure that the offspring reach the age of maturity in order to insure the survival of the group.

It is still the same in the animal world as it is in the animal known as H... Sapien: us. It will be useful to remember that there is nothing that has not happened before, no act, deed or emotion. Neither the causes for it or the reactions. We may be able to bomb out of existence hundreds, thousands, even millions, but the intent to do away with is the same, one to one or multiples.

As it was in the beginning, so it remains. The size of the group or tribes has changed dramatically. The reasons are still the same. The consequence of tribes today, however, have the possibility of obliterating us from the planet. That is different and will continue to be only more ominous.

Until Neanderthal, I believe, there were no "leaders". There were no egos. No desire for more than what was necessary.  To survive was the highest purpose for humans.  This they have done in a remarkable and sad way.  Perhaps there is no other way.  Six million years of evolution and we come to this:  21st Century's Culture Clash. 

Those ancient peoples needed each other in order to survive.  It follows then that the larger a tribe of people became, there also developed a need for some to make decisions, point the way, establish, what I believe were, long standing "rules" of behavior.  I would like to think that everyone understood the necessity to join in a communion of good works for the whole to continue.  But somewhere around 50-100,000 a group of being we call Cro Magnon ventured to parts of the world they had never been to before.  With them, all things "modern", began a rapid development towards what we have now.  Tribes throughout the world known as Americans, Europeans, Russian, Africans, Chinese and Muslim, to name but a few.  True, some of these tribes were established by border rather than a shared history and culture. Others bordered themselves because of racial, religion, political or hegemony.  It matters greatly. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Human" Persons, some history

Posted by Sue on Saturday, September 23, 2006 7:23:18 PM


A small essay for Afarensis Anthropology. Evolution Science/Blog

It is we, us, that is indeed different. I have never considered the word "special" as it applies to modern man. Therefore, for me, the question I believe is still out there is: where did Cro-Magnon, modern man come from? I am certain that somewhere on the planet another sub species developed that ultimately became modern man. The theory that the Neandertals were wiped out by the modern humans "feels" right to me based on the ultimate development of modern humans into what has existed on this planet over 7000 years: barbarism everywhere. The bloodlust and cruelty that has been well documented for over 5000 years to this day, tells me, at least, clearly that modern humans, while having traits of previous primate lineage to whatever degree evolved differently.

It would be highly interesting to see another view of history, using Neandertals to present, just to be able to see if they would be so blindly brillant, stupid, cruel and loving. In fact, I have often speculated that there is a nano percentage of modern man that descended with Neandertal genes which allowed for a higher evolutionary level than the rest.

But, what do I know, I'm just an old broad that loves the subject but never got a chance to go to college and "dig in" so to speak. I'm awaiting the time when I can bravely say: beam me up Scotty.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Why" of it

Posted by Sue on Saturday, September 23, 2006 5:51:13 PM
The "Why" of it
An email conversation caused me to do a bit of research on the political parties in America. I generally knew that the Deomocratic Party had ruled here in this country for about 100 years. With the losses only in l980,l982,1984, 1994, briefly in 2000 and, of course, nothing since.

What I discovered, however, was that the Left or some like type had actually been in power in this country since before 1825! There were the Whigs, Free Soil, Know Nothings and Bull Moose Progressives to name a few. When the Republican and Democratic Parties become more mainstream, these different parties split with half to the Republican and half to the Democrats. What I found instructive was that those in favor of a more agrarian country and pro slavery generally migrated throughout this period towards the Left side of ideology. This is simplistic, but the post needs to be as concise as possible.

Their true loss of power didn't really get achieved for any long period of time, until the current Bush Administration. Eight years out of power in 30 is difficult to say the least.

My focus, however, was on a group that had operated separately until the early 20th century when they merged with the Democrats. They were called the Douglas Democrats. They were largely responsible for Roosevelt's social programs before the WWII and have continued to increase in power gradually until the 1960's when their agenda became part of the anti-war movement. The first time they could and did change the direction of this country. Their "good intentions" for the rest of us based on their ideology created the road paved with gold that has led America to the Hades we have experienced in every part of our country since the 1970's.
They are not, in my opinion, so much Left as truly anti anything American. They believe that they are the leaders in an ideology that stresses the socialist meme of: we know what is best, we will make sure you follow what we say and you will pay with your taxes to make our wishes possible, and you can't do a thing about it!

That is where the hate and vicious vitrol come from, they have not been able to take the reins of this country and until George W. Bush they were confident that their time had come! Bush halted them. In the past five years, they have gradually been exposed for what they are. They have aligned themselves with the existing Fifth Column, Communists and Anarchists and 'hate' became their operative raison d'etre. The middle of the road, reasonable, moderate side of the Left is almost gone. And, as Kos has learned, no one can control them now.

This group has been part of the American landscape since before its inception and continues to this day. One question: do the supporters of these people understand what the goals are? Or, is the hatred too much to listen to reason.

So, is it any wonder why "they" hate America so much. Will Americans make the mistake of voting them in this year in the congress and then let Hillary/Kerry/Gore or some other with their goals gain the presidency?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Something I wish to share

Posted by Sue on Wednesday, August 16, 2006 9:39:20 PM
As most of you can see, I haven't posted since July 12 of this year.  The reason is simple.  How do I possible write anything more or different, even better than those on my blogroll?  I can't.  So, I haven't.  But this afternoon while waiting for a 10 year old to swim for a couple of hours, I read Scientific American.  This is one of several magazines that part of me that want's to "know".  The blogs and websites I visit do that for me for all subjects.  Funny, isn't it that I don't have too much to do with the computer when it comes to science and there is so much happening and no one knows about it?

I have decided that I will try posting once a day, sorry Hugh, can't do more, but it will concentrate on science.  I have a great advantage:  my youngest brother is a physicist and a senior one at that, so I can ask all sorts of questions to fill out my understanding.  Of course, that will mean  not only will I have to read the articles 100% but will also have to read my brothers emails in response to questions.  My brother doesn't know what a short email is all about and although we have discussed it, he can't help himself, he has to fully explain everything.  But, hey, that's O.K. because I learn things I would never learn otherwise.

Wish me luck!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Response on illigal Immigration

Posted by Sue on Saturday, August 05, 2006 8:41:08 PM


I simply cannot read every word of this article.  Very simply put, it is the sort of thing that is afflicting this entire nation. It is possible that it is also afflicting both east and west throughout the European countries.  Perhaps I should say, the countries with a like minded philosophy based on Judeo-Christian teaching.  We are, a true minority on this planet, at least in so far as our understanding of what the Judeo-Christian dictates are.  Not, that a strong minority of Americans and, apparently, a large number of Europeans  do not follow this philosophy quite as you and/or I might.  

The problem is simply this, in my view:  people with nothing to live for in their respective countries go where they feel they can better the lives of themselves and their young.  The problem continues in large measure because, unlike our parents', these immigrants  arrive illegally and are supported by organizations that tell them, on a daily basis, that this or that country is theirs and they should be as they wish.  Unfortunately, our way of life finds it difficult to accommodate this outlook.  We expect, as I am sure Americans in the Forties expected, that we would become Americans and serve the country that had adopted us as full American citizens.  We came with the Calvinist work ethic, as most Judeo-Christian folk did also. 

Now, you ask:  are not the hispanics deluging our country illegally, not also of the Judeo-Christian persuasion?  No, because in the hearts of these people, many uneducated in any fundamental way, they have a philosophy that has been created from a combination of their ancient cultures' and Christianity.  Beliefs that came from civilizations extinct, but whose cultures continue to exist with the gene pool of these poor people.    In that way it is different than what we, in America and other Western countries experience.  We have, after all, been at the evolution of Judaism/Christianity for two thousand years,  The Reformation assisted in a less dogmatic form of the religion.  This didn't happen here in the Americas.  The native American Indians are individualistic and because they were not allowed to assimilate, but allowed to retain their cultures, whether by choice or not, is another point for another time.  The "elites" in the rest of the Americas, prevented the growth of what might be called, mature people, and allowed the cultures to blend the ancient with the newcomer faith.   I believe that this fundamentally changes the type of hispanic that today comes to our country.  They are the peons, different from the Islamofascists that are pouring into countries around the world.  The difference is that the peons will change a country only so much because they will be changed also.  The Islamofascists will not allow a change and there, the danger is exponentially huge..but that is for another day.

However, the big issue is, and will continue to be the word illegal.  America, however dysfunctional, is still a country of rules, morals, law and order.  We have had to put up with the anthesis of of our standards in so many areas of life, particularly beginning in the 60's,  that we are angry, tired and not ready to give in anymore, regardless of how fair, important or bad a thing is.  There is a huge majority of people like this in this country.  We are not filled with hatred, but with frustration that our beliefs and lifestyles are being thrown in our faces on a daily basis.  We are beginning to understand so much of what is real and true vs. what the MSM and the elites in this country have been shoving down the throats of our children and ourselves.  It is a very strong undercurrent and most apparent in that one place where most can speak, see and hear other sides of all issues, the internet.  But, we are fairer to others then they are to us,  but we will persevere nonetheless, and will come to terms with these new people if someone finally says "enough, we will do it, this time correctly".

Am I rambling?  It is a problem with my writing that nothing can be compartmentalized for easy communication because so much is not simple or straight forward, black or white in any facet of life.  Always there are tangents that are causations  that must be explored and fitted into one's overall understanding of things.  I envy you your science and your faith. 

Enough for this evening.  I must stop the bubbling in my brain and let it devolve into thoughts.

All my love and thoughts,

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Rare Dialogue

Posted by Sue on Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:51:03 PM
A rare, for me, one sided, brief dialogue with a poster:


July 21st, 2006 at 12:29 am

Doug #10 read quite a bit of the back and forth of your link, mainly because I love Hitchens.

Lots of “talk” (read posts) but, no concrete consensus about what to do, now, today with any specificity.

Right or wrong, here is what I know:

1. There is a percentage of h... sapiens that hate us because we, through our existence, threaten their ability to control their populations. How do you tell people they can’t have when all around them they are beginning to see what is possible? Keep them afraid through force and/or religion and/or ideology. Keep the kiddies so brainwashed they can no longer think for themselves. Imprison, torture or kill to maintain fear as an operative means of thought and behavior control.

2. The h... sapiens that wish to help, do good, educate, feed, nurse cannot do any more than that. They assume that this will be enough, but it never is.  Because, in order to make the world a better place, you must start with the mind, heart and soul. I would bet you that the North Korean people would fight to the death whether food was provided or not. In that sad country, three generations have passed away and today just about every mind, heart and soul belongs to Kim.

3. There has been no generation that has passed away with a different belief system in the Middle East.  The Islamic faith and their tribal cultures still hold dominance. This generation has just begun to see what can be but may not be able to overcome inbred bias, hatred and tribal alliance.

4. The uberLeft has been on their path for decades here in the USA and they hark back to the same tired memes as the world “out there” appears to want the world to become: populations controlled by, ideology (USA/EU), religion (Middle East), force (China/Russia) all in an effort to tell everyone how to live and procreate. That is precisely why the EU is fast becoming extinct.

America’s saving grace of the moment is that the Left can only use words by whatever means they choose to try and destroy the right and the traditionalists, but no physical or military force…at least not yet.

At my age, I will not see the end of the struggle, if indeed there ever will be an end. However, I feel fear for my grandchildren and great-grandchildren. The same fear I think many people felt when they were in the thick of the Nazi or Japanese oppression. Think Mao, Stalin, Id Amin Pol Pot, on and on and on.

The Koskids may indeed be silent (I don’t read them) because what is there for them to say. They blame Bush or America for absolutely everything and now face the possibility that their chance to take back the power they had for sixty years may be stopped by people coming here to kill us enmasse. What can be said?

july 21st, 2006 at 2:26 am

Doug:

I didn’t say there was nothing that could be done. I meant Hitchens, et.al. Actually, there is something that can be done, but won’t be done: Russia could join with the US/UK to insure Iran stays out of other people’s business, at least right now. But, Russia either can’t or won’t…I think won’t because they want to be the “big guns”. The US/UK could use all their guns but that could only be done if everyone “goes to the mattress”…no preconditions, just get it done. They won’t either because the other kiddies on the block will hate us.

Unlike Kos, I don’t sit on anyone’s shoulders but my own. I have and do read numerous articles, blogs, follow links and do the best I can to see as many sides as possible. One benefit to the internet is that I can accomplish in one week what it would have taken months pre the internet.

But, not knowing how old you are, let me say that my age also helps. I’ve seen, lived through and experienced a great deal of life and have my own philosophy cobbled by all the aforementioned.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Plamed Out?

Posted by Sue on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 7:10:29 PM
Well, Robert Novak has finally spoken about the "Plame Affair".  What will the MSM and lefties do?  There will be a silence all across the land.  They are not blind, deaf or dumb so I am sure they understand that another one of their attacks has proven to be wrong, again.  You would think that someone, somewhere in the Left World would get the message:  you can't lie anymore and get away with it". 

Now that I have said that, it is also true that for many of the regular folk, there will continue to be Flatearthers.  No amount of truth or proof will sway their minds.  It would be very amusing is it weren't so serious.  The regular folks do not understand what it is they are standing up for.  Who leads them or why.  They behave as if any word spoken by those on their side who are trying to win back power at whatever cost, are like Christ at the Sermon on the Mount.  "Holy" words to die for.  Amazing!

There is so much stuff out there that for the first time in history, I think, there may be too much!!  If you are "normal" you get up watch local news while you prepare for work, hear bits and pieces on the ride to take the kids to school and get yourself to work.  Pick up other tidbits from the local rag, during lunch, drive home.  Turn on the tube and maybe, this depends on the age of the children in your home, you turn on the news again or, you watch it just before you listen to Jay Leno (I don't), turn off the tube and proceed into the land of dreams.  That's it.  You might read pieces of magazines throughout the month, maybe while you get your hair cut or stand in the checkout line at the grocery store take in what Brad and Angelina are up to.

This is the extent of the information that gets into the "normal: person's head.  If, like my daughter, you are too busy and stressed out trying to run your department and all that entails, your home and spending time with your kids, then your impressions are formed by "bytes" of info that have sailed by you.  95% of what needs to be known, explored, thought about and verified just floats out there for the committed, crazies, or those like me who love to know almost everything out there and the whys of it.

Oh well, ce la vie? (Can't read French...so don't know if I spelled that right.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The art of blogging?

Posted by Sue on Wednesday, July 12, 2006 2:36:43 PM
Hugh Hewitt, listing things you should do with your blog: post at least twice a day.  Sounds easy enough, doesn't it?  It isn't!  First of all I read around a dozen blogs to start with in the morning.  Then, between the links and checking my email, anything I would write just wouldn't be as in-depth or sophisticated as what Michelle Malkin, Hugh, Hot Air, Captain's Quarters, Angle biting pundits, et.al., to name just few, have already penned to paper.

Another blogger, Sista Toldja (sp?), advises that you should write what interests you or something you know about (among other things).  Fine, but as my college English professor said nearly thirty years ago to me:  "focus, focus, focus!" 

My conclusion: when you are a young adult, it is easier to focus because an individual's experience in subjects has not fully developed.  When you get older, then maybe elderly, focusing on just one thing is tough.  Everything in life stems from a source, but it rays out and each ray, rays out too.  So, while I may say that the Left is way off base, I also need to be more specific.  Specific in a way that gets the point I'm trying to make clear and cogent. 

I find that many columnists write lots of words in their columns, but few could write a few words and still get their point across.  Thomas Sowell comes to mind as a "not a waster of words".

Bloggers appear to use fewer words, most of the time.  I've learned a lot and appreciate what I've read, generally.  I should have said "conservative" bloggers, because, in my opinion, lefties seem to be more wordy.

So. All this just to focus my mind.  I love people.  I am fascinated by what they say, how they say it, what words are used and how.  Body language is great to read.  And, most of the time, it is easy to see the bias of their position.  I want to know why a serial killer is.  What makes some like the poster Deb Frisch put down the ugly, meanspirited diatribe she posted to Protein Wisdom and then, on her own site, comes across as a more "sane", moderate poster.  Her commentators, however, are anything but. 

All of this makes me begin to be more careful of what I post and where.  What words to use and how to string them together to make a point without sounding crazy or easily made out as a traditionalist.

And, while I'm at it, why is it that the spell checker
on this site, (a Conservative Website), does not know how to spell Malkin, Michelle, Hewitt and so many other bloggers and many words?  Just posting!

Well, now I've done it, posted twice in one day. Whew!!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Real Hillary?

Posted by Sue on Friday, July 07, 2006 5:02:12 PM

This is my response post to David Limbaugh's column July 6, 2006, at his site and Red State:

Hillary Clinton's real problem is that if she ever allowed anyone to really know her, they would see she is a committed socialist/marxist. She is anti the 2006 America we are today. She is, in fact, a Kos Kid. She just can't let you know that until she gains what she has been working for the last thirty years: the Presidency!!

I cannot prove it, but I believe, that she and Bill made a compact when they decided to get married: she would do what was necessary to get him where he wanted to be and he, in turn, would do whatever was necessary to get her where she wanted to be. However, what no one prefigured in the equation was that Hillary is just not a likeable person. She has no charisma. She can't give a speech if she has to moderate her emotional responses. And, she is absolutely, positively sure that she is right 100% of the time!

Hillary has to have handlers because she simply cannot be herself. Her handlers must protect her at all costs from all things. I understand that she recently hired on a blogger. Good for her. I think a blog would be great...she doesn't have to control her explosive reactions and her blogger can continue to post calmly while she screeches. Can't wait to read it.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Concentration Country

Posted by Sue on Friday, July 07, 2006 2:28:00 PM
I've gone to my "morning reads" and am about 60% through them.  They include Hugh Hewitt, but I have yet to read any posts about the video that Hot Air has posted on its site: Liberty in North Korea.  Bryan posted it this morning.

Every American should watch it.  It is a stark message that North Korea is, in fact, a concentration camp country.  I would be interested in the Left and Kos' reaction to it.  This is what I believe we will come to someday if the forces allied against us are not stopped.  In fact, is this not the type of country, one way or another, that most  people on this planet live in?  It is a matter of degree, but over half the world is ruled by people who believe they have every right to determine how others should live their lives.

America hasn't ever been perfect, but it surely must be said that it is, on the whole, the best experiment on the planet in over 200 hundred years.  It makes me angry that there are people in this country who can't or won't see that, so they let haters like Cindy Sheehan, Alec Baldwin, Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi et. al, speak so hatefully.  I think these people are the type who wish to tell us how to live because they think they know best.  These people are the puppets of puppeteers like Soros who, while making profits off of our currency, work to drastically change this country into a "socialist" country that gives your and my money to everyone for everything, but keeps what's his safe in offshore countries.

With few exceptions, those who are anti-Americans have their money safe like Straisand, Boxer and now Clinton.  I cannot recall poor folk thrashing the USA in the media.  Students who are supported by their parents or getting government funding to attend school, anarchists co-partners with Marxists, Leftists who cannot understand that their l960's programs have failed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I've done it now!

Posted by Sue on Thursday, July 06, 2006 7:53:55 PM
Well, I think I've done it now!  No longer will I just read and post to other blogs.  Now with this blog, I'll try to put my thoughts on subjects I read throughout the day.  It is a big frightening to think that maybe others may read what is here.  But, it will also be a way of keeping track of items or ideas when they happen so that they don't fade from the mind.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234567891011121314Next »